New England States Postpone Awarding Offshore Wind Contracts

Rhode Island, Connecticut and Massachusetts were originally going to reveal the winning bid on Aug. 8.

Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Jennette Barnes/CAI
Share
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Workers taking a break at a fish processing company in New Bedford have a view of an offshore wind terminal, including a turbine blade.
Jennette Barnes/CAI
New England States Postpone Awarding Offshore Wind Contracts
Copy

Officials in Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut postponed naming winners of regional offshore wind contracts on Aug. 8.

Massachusetts officials said they are delaying the decision for one month to consider the effect of a recent federal grant made to New England states.

The grant will fund regional, on-shore transmission infrastructure for offshore wind.

The three states want to buy up to 6,800 megawatts of power combined. That is more than eight times the size of Vineyard Wind.

Susan Muller, an energy analyst with the Union of Concerned Scientists, said buying that much wind power will help New England during cold snaps when the energy grid is strained.

“We have been paying enormous amounts of money to import oil and gas, just to keep the grid secure and to make sure we don’t have a blackout in winter,” she said.

Wind off New England shores, she said, is “like a clutch player in the winter. It shows up almost exactly in sync with periods where we have very low temperatures.”

Muller is urging the states to “go big” by buying as much wind power as possible.

“We have been paying enormous amounts of money to import oil and gas, just to keep the grid secure and to make sure we don’t have a blackout in winter.”
Susan Muller, energy analyst

Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut cooperated to solicit bids from developers.

Massachusetts and Rhode Island had publicly scheduled their announcements for Aug. 8; Connecticut gave no specific date, saying only that it planned to name winners sometime in the third quarter.

Three companies have submitted bids: Avangrid, Ocean Winds, and Vineyard Offshore. A fourth company, Orsted, bid only in Rhode Island and Connecticut.

In some cases, the limited liability company submitting the application bears a different name from the parent company. SouthCoast Wind Energy LLC applied on behalf of Ocean Winds; Bay State Wind LLC applied on behalf of Orsted.

The winning projects will be built in the designated offshore wind area south of Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

This story was originally published by CAI. It was shared as part of the New England News Collaborative.

A century after Einstein’s theory of general relativity, scientists continue to unravel the mind-bending truth: the universe isn’t just growing—it’s growing in every direction, with no edge, no center, and no end in sight
Newport Historical Society takes visitors back to 1775 and asks “Whose side are you on?” in the American Revolution. And the Newport Art Museum features the nautical paintings of “Sean Landers: Lost at Sea.”
But recusals will still be required on specific bills that pose a conflict of interest
After fighting for her daughter’s care, Kerri Cassino became a powerful advocate for families like hers—leading support groups, influencing policy, and building a community of care through partnerships with The Arc of RI, Impossible Dream, and others
With the state budget set to drop any day, Rhode Island lawmakers and advocates are in a last-minute scramble—vying for money, attention, and legislative wins on hot-button issues like taxing the rich, raising Medicaid rates, and enacting a bottle bill
After a fire shuttered the beloved Matunuck Oyster Bar, state lawmakers are backing a bill to let the restaurant reopen with a temporary outdoor setup—aiming to preserve jobs and extend pandemic-era dining flexibility through 2027