Failed Turbine Blade Caused by ‘Manufacturing Deviation’

GE Vernova Promises Investigation; CEO Says Flaw Should Have Been Identified

Workers help transport an offshore wind turbine blade before it is stacked on top of another at Vineyard Wind in June 2023.
Workers help transport an offshore wind turbine blade at Vineyard Wind in June 2023.
Raquel C. Zaldívar/New England News Collaborative
Share
Workers help transport an offshore wind turbine blade before it is stacked on top of another at Vineyard Wind in June 2023.
Workers help transport an offshore wind turbine blade at Vineyard Wind in June 2023.
Raquel C. Zaldívar/New England News Collaborative
Failed Turbine Blade Caused by ‘Manufacturing Deviation’
Copy

The company that manufactured the blade that broke apart on a Vineyard Wind turbine south of the islands on July 13 plans to inspect every blade it has built to look for flaws.

In an earnings call with investors on July 24, GE Vernova CEO Scott Strazik said the trouble with the Vineyard Wind turbine has been traced to what he called a “manufacturing deviation” at a factory in Canada. He said the flaw should have been identified through the company’s inspection process, and there is no apparent link to a problem with another installation. Strazik added that all 150 blades will be examined by the company, Cape & Islands reported.

“We have not identified information indicating an engineering design flaw in the blade or information in connection with the blade event of we experienced at an offshore wind project in the UK which was caused by an installation error,” Strazik said.

Debris from the failed blade washed up on Nantucket’s south side beaches, forcing them to close to swimming for a day. Efforts continue to monitor beaches for additional debris and to retrieve parts of the blade from the ocean.

Strazik said GE Vernova will examine the blades it has manufactured for offshore wind projects without dismantling turbines that are already built.

“This is work we know how to do. The industry uses non-destructive testing—think ultrasound, think a radiologist, but for a blade—to identify deviations. We are going to do this on every blade, a thorough, prudent process.”

Strazik offered no timeline for completing the inspection.

“We’re working with urgency to scrutinize all of our operations across offshore wind,” he said. “Haste matters here, but we are going to be thorough instead of rushed.”

GE Vernova is coordinating with the firm Resolve Marine to detach the remaining portion of the broken blade from the turbine. One large piece of the blade is on the ocean floor.

The company’s environmental review of the incident says the risk to humans is moderate and takes the form of physical contact with shoreline debris, such as shards of fiberglass.

The risk to aquatic animals was determined to be low.

The review says the blade materials are stable, non-soluble, and non-toxic. However, it notes that the blade has some pieces added on after manufacturing that contain small amounts of PFAS chemicals in the form of Teflon.

This story was originally published by Cape & Islands. It was shared as part of the New England News Collaborative.

Barletta and Aetna, sued over the bridge’s emergency closure, claim Rhode Island failed to disclose a 1992 report that flagged serious structural concerns—raising new questions about RIDOT’s oversight
Republicans aim to rescind $9.4 billion in previously approved spending, targeting public broadcasting and foreign aid, as part of a broader push to align with Trump’s “America First” agenda and showcase fiscal discipline
From bathymetric maps of hidden bays to a Washington Bridge detour ornament that took the internet by storm, Coastal Carve Engravings is blending storytelling, humor, and community in every carved creation
Despite delays and investor hesitation, the nonprofit remains committed to financing its $160 million takeover of Roger Williams and Fatima hospitals — a deal state leaders say is critical to avoiding a health care crisis
Under a tentative agreement, state would pay nearly $2 million to resolve complaint brought by the parent of a 21-year-old student